新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 关于胃病,给你一些忠告 (2009-9-26) tritri · 第一次带咪路散步记 === 新增咪路打滚+上树录像 ==== (2009-4-23) dorin
· 周末随笔 - Adelaide (2008-9-16) pangpang · 在你的巴黎,我终于把你遗忘 (2004-12-18) 妖花痴艳
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 14123|回复: 100

CPA 117 2011 S2 Case 2 Pacific Brands 討論 [复制链接]

发表于 2011-10-11 01:18 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 SS987 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 SS987 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
CPA 117 2011 S2 Case 2 Pacific Brands 討論
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-11 12:08 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 cathytomorrow 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 cathytomorrow 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
考MODULE6 咯。Leadership.

发表于 2011-10-11 12:45 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 kreuz777 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kreuz777 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
借地问 在哪里有CASE 啊 是他寄过来还是ONLINE上 看不到啊 好急

发表于 2011-10-11 14:46 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
re 8steps, how do you guys cut through questions & why

1) how the integration should have been implemented for strategic success & successful change ?

or

2) assessing the integration plan ?   - how addressed - comments ,

---------------------------
re 7s, issues here are  to be  considered as pre09 or post 09 ??  suggested resolutions seem re wot ???

发表于 2011-10-11 20:19 |显示全部楼层

回复 sofiwy 4# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Okay, moving onto case 2 now. had a rough scan last Friday on the scenario. had a hunch that Kotter's 8 steps might be the testing points there. Establish a sense of urgency (stiff notification from banks etc); forming a powerful guiding coalition (receiving credit from high profile figures James MacKenzie and Paul Fiani); creating the vision (design to provide flexibility to deal with changing markets); planning for and creating short-term wins (investors got div reinstated). Just to name a few...

评分

参与人数 3积分 +11 收起 理由
NeoLife + 4 感谢分享
sofiwy + 3 ditto
XR8 + 4 我很赞同

查看全部评分

发表于 2011-10-11 20:29 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
key  stakeholders identification
5Qs (Focus strategy etc by downsizing and cutting nonperforming brands/subsidery)
strategic leadership style clarification

could be the few points the exam may cover. but don't quote me. lol
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-11 20:35 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 schee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 schee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Yes I agree with you yonei999!
I have analysed the case based on above also.

I think also need to look at Dunphy & Stace model for Transformation change

发表于 2011-10-11 23:03 |显示全部楼层

回复 schee 7# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
good point, thanks mate.

发表于 2011-10-11 23:22 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Linda99 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Linda99 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
i thinl also need to look at the Rothschild organization life cycle and strategic leadership model

发表于 2011-10-12 00:42 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yonei999 于 2011-10-11 20:19 发表
Okay, moving onto case 2 now. had a rough scan last Friday on the scenario. had a hunch that Kotter's 8 steps might be the testing points there. Establish a sense of urgency (stiff notification from b ...

ditto,
So far tried to apply Kotter but not enough information to complete last 2 steps, wat you reckon ?

--------------
wat about 7S ?? any clue ?

发表于 2011-10-12 00:43 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yonei999 于 2011-10-11 20:29 发表
key  stakeholders identification
5Qs (Focus strategy etc by downsizing and cutting nonperforming brands/subsidery)
strategic leadership style clarification

could be the few points the exam may cover ...

why is foucs ?thats for niche mkt
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-12 01:08 |显示全部楼层

回复 sofiwy 11# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
in Q4 of 5Qs, only 3 generic strategies are covered. pls refer to txt book 3.18

发表于 2011-10-12 01:09 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
step 7 the appointment of GM, CFO etc.

[ 本帖最后由 yonei999 于 2011-10-12 01:16 编辑 ]

发表于 2011-10-12 01:57 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yonei999 于 2011-10-12 01:08 发表
in Q4 of 5Qs, only 3 generic strategies are covered. pls refer to txt book 3.18

i que why you concl ""Focus strategy etc by downsizing and cutting nonperforming brands/subsidery "" , FS is for niche mkt , irrelevant in here . diff strategy methinks

----------------
ur 7step = my 2nd step,  gosh @ wat about last , no clue yet

so based on above, seems we gonna assessing the integration plan by  using how addressed - comments , instead of addressing how it should have been processed ? ? ur turn...(monkey04)

发表于 2011-10-12 02:06 |显示全部楼层

回复 sofiwy 14# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
refer to 3.22 of the txt book about Generic Strategy: focus. Not sure where the niche mkt is from. any quote from the txt book

step 7, refer to reading 6.2 page 3. Under No. 7, "hiring , promoting and developing employees..."

am scratching my head about step 8, too.

Time to hit the sack. And tomorrow will be another day. :)

评分

参与人数 1积分 +2 收起 理由
sofiwy + 2 thxing you

查看全部评分

发表于 2011-10-12 02:53 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
pg3.18
focus strategy incl focus diff and focus low cost on the narrow target mkt (nicke mkt ),  NFA on PBs...

ditto, 7th...gosh .. x . thx heaps (monkey10) (monkey10)

anyone got clues on MicKinsey 7S ?? NFA in here ?(monkey08)
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-12 15:57 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Chchou 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Chchou 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Focus: sold-off to narrow down
Differentiation: stable/top brands

发表于 2011-10-12 20:19 |显示全部楼层

回复 Linda99 9# 帖子

此文章由 Victorialiu1 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Victorialiu1 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
agree, Shake- out, and Surgeons style. heaps case facts could be discussed.

发表于 2011-10-12 20:47 |显示全部楼层

回复 Victorialiu1 18# 帖子

此文章由 mandymei 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 mandymei 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Do you agree it's consumer goods and textile industry

发表于 2011-10-12 21:10 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 schee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 schee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
to Mandymei, yes agree the industry is consumer good and textile manufacturing

发表于 2011-10-12 23:47 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
for anyone that's unable to copy and paste directly from the preseen exam material. try Advanced PDF Password Recovery to unlock the file. sorry I was unable to upload the file cuz of the cap of 80k...

[ 本帖最后由 yonei999 于 2011-10-12 23:53 编辑 ]
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-13 00:19 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
food for thought: pg 8 of preseen material

Merrill Lynch analyst David Errington is agruing PB's transformation plan as strategic error and value destroy. Clarify what value he is referring to and support it with evidence?

发表于 2011-10-13 00:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 Chchou 于 2011-10-12 15:57 发表
Focus: sold-off to narrow down
Differentiation: stable/top brands


kinda agree more here, focus-diff strategy


re 7s, has org considered any misalignments per cs2 ?

re 8steps, how do you guys comment on each step, seems text based ?

发表于 2011-10-13 00:25 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 yonei999 于 2011-10-13 00:19 发表
food for thought: pg 8 of preseen material

Merrill Lynch analyst David Errington is agruing PB's transformation plan as strategic error and value destroy. Clarify what value he is referring to and su ...

i think it be referred to misalignments through transformation
correct me if wrong ~~~

发表于 2011-10-13 01:06 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Chchou 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Chchou 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 sofiwy 于 2011-10-13 00:25 发表

i think it be referred to misalignments through transformation
correct me if wrong ~~~

Value destroy: sell- off brands and write-down assets

For 7s, I can't find fact to do the analysis, apart from for culture(part of shared value): selecting people for key position.

If anyone thinks 7s is applicable for case 2, please advise:)

发表于 2011-10-13 10:14 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Chchou 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Chchou 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
楼主辛苦一点把大家认为的考点真理在一楼,大家认为怎么样啊。
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-13 17:51 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
it mentioned "the company was listed by a private equity investor" for several times.

i am not clearly understand what would be the consequence if a company is listed by an private investor.


thanks guys

发表于 2011-10-13 18:09 |显示全部楼层

回复 siyuezhao 27# 帖子

此文章由 schee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 schee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
probably just trying to say that the company was in the edge of collapsing and have started to used up all the investors' funds.

发表于 2011-10-13 18:48 |显示全部楼层

回复 schee 28# 帖子

此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
thanks a lot

发表于 2011-10-14 01:31 |显示全部楼层

回复 siyuezhao 27# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
private equity seeks short term return and in reality cares little about how the corporate operates. as such it may cause clashes with the management in organization who possesses long term view or strategy thereof.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部