|
此文章由 Anti 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Anti 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 Anti 于 2018-1-26 21:34 编辑
that means the child is one of the reasons and the cause of emotional pain rather than physical pain of the war memory to be understood normally.
I reckon the context is trying to tell us during the war, those Aussie soldiers had affairs with the Vietnamese girls, and became fathers there, as well. When they returned to Australia, what happened in Vietnam, becomes something they cannot talk about; the war, the affairs, the kids, all those things should be left behind in Vietnam, but could not be. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|