|
此文章由 pipitang 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 pipitang 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 pipitang 于 2023-7-26 21:55 编辑
这书的结论本身是很有争议的
摘抄一点维基百科的争议汇总(Harris 是这本书的作者)
The Nurture Assumption received mixed responses. The neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky says her book is "based on solid science".[6] The psychologist Steven Pinker of Harvard predicts that the book "will come to be seen as a turning point in the history of psychology".[7]
However, the psychologist Frank Farley claims that "she's taking an extreme position based on a limited set of data. Her thesis is absurd on its face, but consider what might happen if parents believe this stuff!"[6] Wendy Williams, who studies how environment affects IQ, argues that "there are many, many good studies that show parents can affect how children turn out in both cognitive abilities and behavior".[6] The psychologist Jerome Kagan argues that Harris "ignores some important facts, ones that are inconsistent with this book's conclusions".[8]
Harris rejects the idea that The Nurture Assumption will encourage parents to neglect or mistreat their children.[9] She maintains that parents will continue to treat their children well "for the same reason you are nice to your friends and your partner, even though you have no hopes of molding their character. For the same reason your great-grandparents were nice to their children, even though they didn't believe in the nurture assumption". |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|