澳洲和世界时政今日: 0|主题: 2867

版主: Y叔

1 ... 60 61 62 636465 66 67 68 ... 77 / 77 页下一页

新窗筛选: 全部主题时间排序: 默认排序\|精华		作者	回复/查看	最后发表


What I hate about Australia Day. 最后跟贴：没什么好奇怪的，就像中国人很多人都有莫名其妙的荣誉感，优越感，认为中国很多东西都是最好最强大的生意人最有钱，打仗最强等等。西方国家的群体也只是有同样的感觉而已。最后发表：choco2468	craigie 2011-1-25 14:32	21019	choco2468 2011-1-25 14:57
澳总理出席华人社团晚宴期待着对中国的访问最后跟贴：双方说得都不错的。最后发表：mylt	franklee303 2011-1-23 21:05	1916	mylt 2011-1-24 11:00
拍卖新足迹三周年纪念邮票一套加新足迹2011新春贺卡，款项捐给受水灾影响的昆士兰人民（一共募得$870,捐款收据见1楼）最后跟贴：还有忘记说了，三位的贺卡，邮票和围裙也都全部寄出，early next week应该能收到最后发表：astina ...2 3 4	astina 2011-1-13 21:14	1016082	astina 2011-1-21 18:50
暴雨南移维省告急最后跟贴：楼主刚刚闻到的，是楼主的新闻最后发表：mike@lu@mel	封尔侯 2011-1-21 12:00	81380	mike@lu@mel 2011-1-21 15:37
维省水灾最后跟贴：我代表维州人民接受你的慰问。那啥，慰问品呢？、最后发表：云淡风轻	封尔侯 2011-1-21 12:12	4934	云淡风轻 2011-1-21 14:05
澳洲应变能力不及新西兰-比较基督城地震和维州水灾最后跟贴：新西兰南岛经常地震的，昆州水灾30几年才一次。不一样的啦！最后发表：sindyjm	封尔侯 2010-9-13 13:36	61586	sindyjm 2011-1-18 09:03
强大，洪水前后对比最后跟贴：洪水无情人有情，最后发表：云淡风轻	easter 2011-1-17 15:05	11276	云淡风轻 2011-1-17 15:09
水漫澳洲。。。最后跟贴：哈哈最后发表：cuppa	kokozz 2011-1-1 17:50	211611	cuppa 2011-1-17 10:50
这个版面人多，所以暂定发这里了，关于帮助灾区最后跟贴：http://www.emergencyvolunteering.com.au/ 这个是某行业协会发过来的，看来是真得很缺人手。最后发表：老猫晒太阳	培培 2011-1-13 21:30	2884	老猫晒太阳 2011-1-14 08:07
万事达组织终止了使用其旗下的mastercard向Julian Assange汇款最后跟贴：美帝说了算，‘性侵犯’也是对美帝的侵犯。最后发表：chendean	diehard 2010-12-7 20:34	161708	chendean 2011-1-10 10:44
澳大利亚8月季调后失业率为5.1%，预期为5.2% 最后跟贴：现在人们消费欲望没之前那么强了谁都得incase ~~ 最后发表：绿茶芝士蛋糕	tonyju626 2010-9-9 12:36	151740	绿茶芝士蛋糕 2011-1-9 20:21
澳大利亚昆士兰州遭受严重水患灾害，联合国秘书长潘基文来到昆士兰慰问灾民最后跟贴：有补助吗又是声援.... 最后发表：绿茶芝士蛋糕	franklee303 2011-1-7 20:44	1842	绿茶芝士蛋糕 2011-1-9 20:20
澳洲水电费天然气食品价格均飙升最后跟贴：真是个令人沮丧的消息。最后发表：AliciaNaoNao	jimmy666 2011-1-6 00:15	21241	AliciaNaoNao 2011-1-6 16:57
维省工党今天滚蛋吧。最后跟贴：维州人受够了！最后发表：mike@lu@mel	mike@lu@mel 2010-11-27 11:21	191865	mike@lu@mel 2010-12-17 16:49
Bank reforms announced 最后跟贴：羊毛出在羊身上。最后发表：小熊猫	diehard 2010-12-12 11:57	21300	小熊猫 2010-12-17 15:28
NSW自由党的宣传资料最后跟贴：看来还算是不错，但是还得等到明年揭晓。最后发表：kenz	黑山老妖 2010-10-2 15:28	71246	kenz 2010-12-17 15:25
投票后民调最后跟贴：没想到废票的比例这麽大最后发表：wdmznzd	wdmznzd 2010-8-21 10:18	73289	wdmznzd 2010-12-13 21:41
你对Tony Abbott的表现满意吗？最后跟贴：不知道他拍三级你们满意么最后发表：10xFaster	wdmznzd 2010-9-7 20:31	132148	10xFaster 2010-12-13 21:26
你对新总理是否满意？最后跟贴：no 最后发表：wangwalter ...2	wdmznzd 2010-9-7 19:31	425824	wangwalter 2010-12-13 21:25
Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths 最后跟贴：http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... 75xjq-1225967241332 WIKILEAKS deserves protection, not threats and attacks. IN 1958 a young Rupert Murdoch, then owner and editor of Adelaide's The News, wrote: "In the race between secrecy and truth, it seems inevitable that truth will always win." His observation perhaps reflected his father Keith Murdoch's expose that Australian troops were being needlessly sacrificed by incompetent British commanders on the shores of Gallipoli. The British tried to shut him up but Keith Murdoch would not be silenced and his efforts led to the termination of the disastrous Gallipoli campaign. Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public. I grew up in a Queensland country town where people spoke their minds bluntly. They distrusted big government as something that could be corrupted if not watched carefully. The dark days of corruption in the Queensland government before the Fitzgerald inquiry are testimony to what happens when the politicians gag the media from reporting the truth. These things have stayed with me. WikiLeaks was created around these core values. The idea, conceived in Australia, was to use internet technologies in new ways to report the truth. WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately? Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest. WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption. People have said I am anti-war: for the record, I am not. Sometimes nations need to go to war, and there are just wars. But there is nothing more wrong than a government lying to its people about those wars, then asking these same citizens to put their lives and their taxes on the line for those lies. If a war is justified, then tell the truth and the people will decide whether to support it. If you have read any of the Afghan or Iraq war logs, any of the US embassy cables or any of the stories about the things WikiLeaks has reported, consider how important it is for all media to be able to report these things freely. WikiLeaks is not the only publisher of the US embassy cables. Other media outlets, including Britain's The Guardian, The New York Times, El Pais in Spain and Der Spiegel in Germany have published the same redacted cables. Yet it is WikiLeaks, as the co-ordinator of these other groups, that has copped the most vicious attacks and accusations from the US government and its acolytes. I have been accused of treason, even though I am an Australian, not a US, citizen. There have been dozens of serious calls in the US for me to be "taken out" by US special forces. Sarah Palin says I should be "hunted down like Osama bin Laden", a Republican bill sits before the US Senate seeking to have me declared a "transnational threat" and disposed of accordingly. An adviser to the Canadian Prime Minister's office has called on national television for me to be assassinated. An American blogger has called for my 20-year-old son, here in Australia, to be kidnapped and harmed for no other reason than to get at me. And Australians should observe with no pride the disgraceful pandering to these sentiments by Julia Gillard and her government. The powers of the Australian government appear to be fully at the disposal of the US as to whether to cancel my Australian passport, or to spy on or harass WikiLeaks supporters. The Australian Attorney-General is doing everything he can to help a US investigation clearly directed at framing Australian citizens and shipping them to the US. Prime Minister Gillard and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have not had a word of criticism for the other media organisations. That is because The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel are old and large, while WikiLeaks is as yet young and small. We are the underdogs. The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings. Has there been any response from the Australian government to the numerous public threats of violence against me and other WikiLeaks personnel? One might have thought an Australian prime minister would be defending her citizens against such things, but there have only been wholly unsubstantiated claims of illegality. The Prime Minister and especially the Attorney-General are meant to carry out their duties with dignity and above the fray. Rest assured, these two mean to save their own skins. They will not. Every time WikiLeaks publishes the truth about abuses committed by US agencies, Australian politicians chant a provably false chorus with the State Department: "You'll risk lives! National security! You'll endanger troops!" Then they say there is nothing of importance in what WikiLeaks publishes. It can't be both. Which is it? It is neither. WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed. But the US, with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone. US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates admitted in a letter to the US congress that no sensitive intelligence sources or methods had been compromised by the Afghan war logs disclosure. The Pentagon stated there was no evidence the WikiLeaks reports had led to anyone being harmed in Afghanistan. NATO in Kabul told CNN it couldn't find a single person who needed protecting. The Australian Department of Defence said the same. No Australian troops or sources have been hurt by anything we have published. But our publications have been far from unimportant. The US diplomatic cables reveal some startling facts: ► The US asked its diplomats to steal personal human material and information from UN officials and human rights groups, including DNA, fingerprints, iris scans, credit card numbers, internet passwords and ID photos, in violation of international treaties. Presumably Australian UN diplomats may be targeted, too. ► King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia asked the US to attack Iran. ► Officials in Jordan and Bahrain want Iran's nuclear program stopped by any means available. ► Britain's Iraq inquiry was fixed to protect "US interests". ► Sweden is a covert member of NATO and US intelligence sharing is kept from parliament. ► The US is playing hardball to get other countries to take freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay. Barack Obama agreed to meet the Slovenian President only if Slovenia took a prisoner. Our Pacific neighbour Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to accept detainees. In its landmark ruling in the Pentagon Papers case, the US Supreme Court said "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government". The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth. Julian Assange is the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks. 最后发表：diehard	diehard 2010-12-8 23:57	01179	diehard 2010-12-8 23:57
Sweden's reputation is on trial in Julian Assange case 最后跟贴：http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opin ... rfhqf-1225965772832 APPARENTLY having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for Rape 很显然，在瑞典，在女方同意发生性关系，但你没有戴避孕套的话，会被判刑至少两年监禁。 That was the basis for a recent revival of rape allegations against Wikileaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity. Sweden’s Public Prosecutor’s Office was embarrassed in August this year when they leaked to the media that they were seeking to arrest Assange for rape then on the same day withdrew the arrest warrant because in their own words there was “no evidence”. The damage to Assange’s reputation is incalculable. Three months on and three prosecutors later the Swedes seemed to be clear on their basis to proceed with a headline grabbing international arrest warrant. If consensual sex that started out with the intention of condom use and actual condom use ended up without condom, that’s rape. Statements by the two female “victims” Sophia Wilen and Anna Ardin that there was no fear or violence would stop a rape charge in any western country dead in its tracks. Rape is a crime of violence. Both women boasted of their of their respective celebrity conquests on internet posts and mobile phones texts after the intimacy they would now see him destroyed for. Ardin hosted a party in Assange’s honour at her flat after the ‘crime’ and tweeted to her followers that she was with the “the world's coolest smartest people, it's amazing!” Ardin has sought unsuccessfully to delete these and thereby destroy evidence of Assange’s innocence She has published on the internet a guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends. Their sms texts to each other show a plan to contact the Swedish newspaper Expressen before hand in order to maximise the damage to Assange. They belong to the same political group and attended a public lecture given by Assange and organised by them. The exact content of Sophia Wilén’s mobile phone texts is not yet known but their bragging and generally positive content about Assange has been confirmed by Swedish prosecutors. The consent of both women to sex with Assange has been confirmed by prosecutors. Niether Wilén’s nor Ardin’s texts complain of rape. These facts should make any normal prosecutor gravely concerned about whether a false complaint is being made. But then neither Arden nor Wilén complained to the police. They collaboratively ‘sought advice’, a technique in Sweden enabling citizens to avoid being sued for making false complaints In any normal first world country the prosecutor would know that her case not just a deeply flawed waste of time by a dangerous perversion of the serious objectives of rape laws. The womens’ lawyer Claes Borgström was questioned by the media as to how the women themselves could be contradicting the legal characterisation of Swedish prosecutors; a crime of non-consent by consent. Borgström’s answer is emblematic of how divorced from reality this matter is: “they (the women) are not jurists”. You need a law degree to know whether you have been raped or not in Sweden. How the Swedish authorities propose to prosecute for victims who neither saw themselves as such nor acted as such is easily answered: You’re not a Swedish lawyer so you wouldn’t understand anyway. Make no mistake: It is not Julian Assange that is on trial here but Sweden and its reputation as a modern and model country with rules of law. - James D. Catlin is a Melbourne barrister who acted for Assange in London earlier this year. 最后发表：diehard	diehard 2010-12-7 20:30	01080	diehard 2010-12-7 20:30
Open letter: To Julia Gillard, re Julian Assange 最后跟贴：老大，不是我写的呀。是转的。最后发表：diehard	diehard 2010-12-7 20:15	21504	diehard 2010-12-7 20:27
吉拉德说维基解密网站的主编违反澳洲法律最后跟贴：肯定有把柄在人家手里！最后发表：simonhuang	diehard 2010-12-2 21:16	41374	simonhuang 2010-12-3 14:56
以选票划分墨尔本的政治经济版图最后跟贴：么有最后发表：ys98	Y叔 2010-11-30 13:27	121296	ys98 2010-12-1 14:38
你们说今天维州选举的形势归功于谁？最后跟贴：原帖由小小强于 2010-11-30 13:05 发表很简单，工党吧kevinT了嘛这样说，如果有足迹党，AS要小心了。最后发表：blh	Y叔 2010-11-29 10:10	221384	blh 2010-11-30 13:39
我是不是错过了NSW州选举？FINE？最后跟贴：原来是VIC的朋友提醒错了人了，哈哈哈哈，谢谢楼上的朋友最后发表：VeradaGuy	VeradaGuy 2010-11-29 08:55	21253	VeradaGuy 2010-11-29 09:03
Brumby就是个倒霉催的，从来没赢过任何大选最后跟贴：嘿嘿，这里对政治挺热情的最后发表：炽热风	Y叔 2010-11-28 10:42	51115	炽热风 2010-11-29 01:34
DLP 与Australian Labor Party 有什么不同？最后跟贴：DLP 号称公共交通免费最后发表：a711012	summer2205 2010-11-20 23:02	61274	a711012 2010-11-27 22:43
你认为谁更适合做澳洲总理最后跟贴：于人何干？最后发表：kov	wdmznzd 2010-8-22 01:58	244518	kov 2010-11-27 20:34
两主要政党秘密收集大量选民的隐私信息. 最后跟贴：有秘密可言么？！最后发表：kov	BitterMelon 2010-11-23 13:03	31263	kov 2010-11-27 20:33
分享两幅漫画最后跟贴：我是来歪楼的最后发表：kov	Y叔 2010-11-10 09:54	61039	kov 2010-11-27 20:32
delete 最后跟贴：这点雨，这雨点.... 最后发表：kov	mybackyard 2010-11-27 14:31	41002	kov 2010-11-27 20:30
选举口号之"把船民赶回去!" 最后跟贴：还是赶回去的好最后发表：百里挑一	稀饭 2010-11-15 09:47	162083	百里挑一 2010-11-27 16:35
足迹独家连线小陆(05/09/10更新）最后跟贴：你真是个人才！最后发表：百里挑一 ...2	MJJ 2010-8-15 01:50	595860	百里挑一 2010-11-27 14:42
请问谁知道bentleigh在哪投票今天？最后跟贴：www.131vec.com.au http://vecapps.vic.gov.au/vclookup/ 最后发表：clur	whsg_au 2010-11-27 11:57	11130	clur 2010-11-27 11:59
小白一下：为使么Mel 人喜欢Green ？最后跟贴：很多人都是两边都不喜欢，就给GREEN了最后发表：RAMBLER ...2	江湖郎中 2010-8-23 12:15	313004	RAMBLER 2010-11-22 13:46
关于general state election 最后跟贴：说是选州长，其实还是选议员。最后发表：ys98	xizi20062006 2010-11-7 18:49	81274	ys98 2010-11-11 22:51
默哀一分钟最后跟贴：原帖由探索者于 2010-11-11 09:30 发表楼主怎么把2月份的新闻贴出来了？同不解最后发表：云淡风轻	LONELYMELBOURNE 2010-11-11 09:13	3985	云淡风轻 2010-11-11 09:34
请问工党和反对党在为什么吵最后跟贴：就怕吵了半天，啥事都没办成最后发表：znby	nmm 2010-9-24 15:53	151272	znby 2010-10-30 15:31
开大选结果盘口的竞猜最后跟贴：我选对了最后发表：园中树	melbourneiris 2010-7-19 10:53	193422	园中树 2010-10-25 07:25

1 ... 60 61 62 636465 66 67 68 ... 77 / 77 页下一页

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册

澳洲和世界时政 今日: 0|主题: 2867

快速发帖

澳洲和世界时政今日: 0|主题: 2867