原帖由 xyxyxy 于 22/2/2009 18:02 发表 非常感谢，认真阅读了一下原来的帖子，再回到westpac网站，发现rocket的那个package计划没有了，现在改成$199元年费，比我低很多，不过多了一项estabilsih fee，仔细算下来好像还是新的package好，可惜也不能换了。
It is not all good news but then again not all bad news either. During 2008 most mainland capital city markets recorded a softening in median dwelling values. However, there were some winners – Darwin and Perth bucked the trend, according to RP Data’s latest research. RP Data research analyst Cameron Kusher says the result was clearly a demonstration of the weakness in the more expensive markets during the year. Across the country dwelling values fell by 2.6 per cent, with Perth being the most affected falling 8.8 per cent. Sydney and Brisbane followed with 2.9 per cent and 2.8 per cent, respectively. However, says Kusher, these results have to be put into perspective as “the value of the share market fell by over 40 per cent across 2008”. Houses House values fell by 2.9 per cent. Darwin and Adelaide were the only capitals to record positive capital growth. Kusher says that 12 months ago they were the two cheapest mainland capital city markets. “Interestingly, Darwin is now more expensive than both Brisbane and Melbourne.” Brisbane (-3.0 per cent), Sydney (-3.6 per cent) and Perth (-8.3 per cent) all recorded falls in excess of the national levels. Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth Darwin Canberra National Dec 07 577,935 453,281 458,701 404,770 513,769 419,663 492,295 493,098 Dec 08 556,877 448,189 445,106 411,694 471,343 468,520 483,861 478,821 Units Units performed a little better with median values softening by 1.8 per cent. The most affordable cities Darwin and Adelaide again recorded the greatest growth. Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide PerthDarwin Canberra National Dec 07 422,983 358,329 333,129 312,740 470,437 296,285 362,112 389,260 Dec 08 418,246 352,592 326,048 335,265 418,435 319,523 363,152 382,320 Dwellings Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth Darwin Canberra National Dec 07 519,353 426,996 433,113 383,249 504,492 379,889 459,941 463,257 Dec 08 504,466 421,725 420,845 393,821 460,016 420,487 453,862 451,088
原帖由 lvtu 于 2009-2-9 09:25 发表 没抵税？他们买投资房就是为了那点退税。没贷款？他们90％贷款，只够交10％的首付，还得买保险（因为拿不出20％的首付）。这两口子买投资房的根本目的就是为了退税，而且一天也没委托中介出租，这些年全是自己租 ...
原帖由 bee4217 于 2009-2-6 09:00 发表 已经中高收入了还要政府给钱？！什么逻辑
本版积分规则 发表帖子
