Safe School Coalition的过去，现在，和未来-自由党如果这次竞选获胜，在2017年将会停止所有对这个计划的拨款。

含笑领便当

更新：这次自由党获胜，VIC之外的家长暂时不用担心SSC的问题了。

而最近的新闻说Rod Ward正在VIC RMIT就SSC培训Primary School的老师。


Kids of 7 learn ‘gender diversity’ from Safe Schools Coalition

Ms Ward, who has a masters degree in gender studies but no teaching qualification, was photographed at RMIT in Melbourne lecturing a group of student primary school teachers about the program.


现在VIC政府搞了个自己的SSC网站，SSCV……Roz Ward是Manager and Co-Founder……摆明了要和联邦政府整改过的SSC唱对台戏了。

Safe School Coalition Victoria

这个网站说：
Welcome to our new website! We are dedicated to supporting sexual diversity, intersex, and gender diversity in Victorian schools. Exciting new content coming soon!

新的SSCV网站下方还是提供链接前往Minus18，这也是个非常有争议的网站。很多初版SSC的内容就来自Minus18，Part of the Government’s recommendations is that Safe Schools can no longer reference third party links such as Minus18。这个网站教导不要在意家长，just do what you like。

这个网站教导如何束胸，如何隐藏自己在网络上的浏览记录，我相信任何家长都不会喜欢这个网站。

How to bind your chest

Cover Your Tracks

这里是doing it的起源地。
When Are You Ready To Do It?

原版的SSC doing it教材，现在已经被自由党政府彻底从SSC中删除。



简单对比

	工党原始版本的SSC（当前在VIC实行的）	自由党修改版本的SSC
内容	激进社会主义活动者，LGBTI人士编写的教材，推送gay交友网站 minus 18(包含sex toy shop，gay night club）链接	删除了富有争议的教材，删除gay交友网站 minus 18 链接
实行范围	包括primary school在内的所有学校	仅在secondary school实行，叫停在primary school实行
家长权利	无知情权和选择权，为所有公立学校mandatory课程	家长有知情权和选择权

过去

2013年几位工党大佬支持了这个所谓的Safe School coalition计划，趁着工党还在位通过了。
Penny Wong对这个计划当然是不遗余力的支持啦，原因么你懂的。而小短，当时是教育部长，自然也是大大的出了力的。


之后工党下台，自由党上台，这个计划并没有像VIC的East West Link那样被砍掉，因为自由党不是工党，不会为了反对而反对去全盘否定前任政府的政策计划，同时当时这个项目的危害性还没有暴露出来。

---

现在

这个计划开始实施后，因为包含太多过于激进的内容（下图是某教学内容截图）
详细内容可以参考这个帖子
关于工党推行的LGBTI体验课程Safe School coalition，我们不歧视LGBTI，可为什么要强行让我们的孩子去“体验”LGBTI？




遭到大量家长的抗议和抵制，自由党联邦政府对这个计划的教学内容和材料进行了大幅整改，删除了很多激进内容，同时叫停在primary school里推行这个计划。但VIC工党政府不顾联邦政府的叫停还是强行在primary school里推行这些内容。

Safe Schools Coalition设计师Roz Ward 和VIC教育部长James Merlino 在LGBTI自豪游行上


这个Roz Ward的背景也很有意思，据说此人其实是一名马克思主义者（communist），她一直追求着极端的平等，就是说希望这个社会没有性别，选择当男的当 女的，或者当不男不女的都可以，跟生殖器官一点关系都没有。想和谁发生关系都可以，也不用管人家的性别，这是不是有点太超脱了。

Roz Ward在Safe Schools教师培训集会上坦言："这个项目其实并不是名义上说的反对欺凌和歧视"，她说，其真正目的是向下一代宣教性别及性行为多元化理论——培养 LGBT从娃娃抓起！这一段发言被会众无意中录下，在Youtube上公诸于众后在澳洲主流社会引起轩然大波，呼吁取缔SafeSchools声音四起。

leaked video

终于，在大家愤然抵制后，终于引起了澳洲国会的重视，并且进行听证。就在听证过程中，多位议员更是列举出了更多骇人听闻的事实，比方说“Safe Schools项目制作部门的领导人之一Gary Dowsett多次发表支持恋童癖行为的言论”。

最让人心寒的是，面对愤怒的父母，维多利亚工党政府仍然继续推行Safe School，并且曾在几周前把Roz Ward任命为教育部主管，幸运的是，新官上任还没点火，就被舆论攻击被迫辞职了。

Safe School Coalition Project Officer Joel Radcliffe also spoke at the symposium, saying the opinions of parents don’t really matter.

“(Parents) seem to have a lot of power over schools.  Parents don't have the power to shut this down,” he said.  “There's an insignificant minority that might have an issue with it.  None of them really ever say anything.  I know one person that does.  The Principal knows how to deal with that person.”

---

未来

自由党如果这次竞选获胜，在2017年将会停止所有对这个计划的拨款。

Education Minister Senator Birmingham confirmed at Parliament House the Safe Schools program would not receive any more federal funding beyond 2017

The Coalition declared that Safe Schools would receive no federal funding after next year, when the Gillard government’s $8 million contribution to the program runs out.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... 7327837abebdb3a7f9f

如果工党绿党获胜，会对这个项目增加拨款，甚至可能像美国奥巴马政府那样，强制在学校里推行男女同厕，同更衣室。

Bill Shorten committed to extending funding for the contentious Safe Schools program beyond 2017

aimili424

支持恋童癖言论，不能再恶心了。

让支持恋童癖的人管理教育，是澳洲儿童的噩梦。

Wheelershill

感謝分享。
作为家长对这个项目非常不安。
现在是用选票发言的时候了。

sunwave201

sunbury

说自由党2017会停funding的有出处吗？能贴出来让大家看看吗？谢谢

soul

对工党真的是无语了

hotornot

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 09:32
说自由党2017会停funding的有出处吗？能贴出来让大家看看吗？谢谢

他还说工党会增加拨款呢，出处在哪里？

就是信口雌黄

自由党教育部长直到2016年还支持这个Safe School Coalition，他视而不见

cangaru

临近大选，两边的粉开始互相较劲了

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 09:32
说自由党2017会停funding的有出处吗？能贴出来让大家看看吗？谢谢

The Opposition Leader also committed to extending funding for the contentious Safe Schools program beyond 2017 while providing no solid defence of religious freedoms amid a fresh push to tighten anti-discrimination measures.

While the Greens this week tied themselves to a termination of the religious exemptions in the national anti-discrimination framework, Labor’s own policy platform commits the party to a re-examination of the appropriateness of the existing carve-outs. The review leaves open the prospect of a Shorten-led Labor government winding back or even removing religious exemptions from Australia’s anti-discrimination laws.

Opposition legal affairs spokesman Mark Dreyfus suggested a strong approach would be taken on this issue. “Labor believes that no faith, no religion, no set of beliefs should ever be used as an instrument of division or exclusion,” Mr Dreyfus told The Australian.

“Condemning anyone, discriminating against anyone, vilifying anyone is a violation of the values we all share, a violation which can never be justified by anyone’s faith or belief.”

Asked last night if Labor supported or opposed removing the religious exemptions as per the Greens proposal, The Australian was referred by Bill Shorten’s office to the ALP platform, which argues the carve-outs must not prevent people from accessing “essential social services”.

No clear answer was given by Mr Shorten on whether he supported the removal of religious exemptions. When pressed on this issue on the campaign trail in Sydney, he said: “We do believe that people shouldn’t be discriminated against in their employment on the basis of the criteria which currently exist. So we are not as keen to just simply start changing everything, denying people their employment rights.”

The Safe Schools program triggered a conservative backlash for introducing students to the concept of gender fluidity and encouraging school kids as young as 11 to role-play being in same sex relationships.

Malcolm Turnbull ordered a review of the scheme this year following a revolt by a majority of the Coalition backbench, with Education Minister Simon Birmingham then limiting the program to secondary schools, removing inappropriate content and involving parents.

Yesterday the Prime Minister said the program had been modified to the extent there was more parental involvement and consent in it “which I think most parents would find reassuring’’.

“Labor and the Greens are heading in a trajectory of their own,’’ Mr Turnbull said.

Asked about the Safe Schools program yesterday, Mr Shorten confirmed Labor would continue to fund the scheme but did not say whether he would keep the heavy curtailments introduced by Senator Birmingham.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... 33819b4b0449e4664a8

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 09:32
说自由党2017会停funding的有出处吗？能贴出来让大家看看吗？谢谢

Safe Schools won’t be funded beyond 2017

THE Safe Schools Coalition Australia (SSCA) will work with with the Federal Government which announced it plans to make changes to the Safe Schools program after the results of a review into the program, despite confirmation it won’t be funded beyond it’s current contract which expires next year.

The Safe Schools programs was designed by the SSCA to protect LGBTI school students from bullying and to educate teachers and school staff about LGBTI issues.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull commissioned the review into Safe Schools after caving into pressure from far-right senators and Liberal backbenchers and The Australian newspaper, who suggested the program was trying to “indoctrinate” young children into a gay “lifestyle”.

Conducted by the University of Western Australia’s Professor Bill Louden, the results of the review were delivered to MPs on Tuesday night and Education Minister Simon Birmingham made them public today — which is also official National Day Of Action Against Bullying — along with the changes it planned to make to the program.

Senator Birmingham also confirmed to journalists at Parliament House today the Safe Schools program would not receive any more federal funding beyond 2017.

含笑领便当

The Coalition declared that Safe Schools would receive no federal funding after next year, when the Gillard government’s $8 million contribution to the program runs out.

The Coalition declared that Safe Schools would receive no federal funding after next year, when the Gillard government’s $8 million contribution to the program runs out. It also banned links to third-party materials on the Safe Schools website, such as the promotion of gay and transgender youth network Minus 18.

Ms Ellis yesterday would not reveal Labor’s policy on Safe Schools and whether it would fund the program after 2017.

“We established the Safe Schools program and we think it does incredibly important work,’’ she said. “The government will cut this program entirely next year. Labor will have more to say on our education policies in the lead up to the election.”

Education Minister Simon Birmingham said: “If the Labor Party choose not to support our responsible and measured changes then they will need to explain to Australian parents why they believe the removed web links and classroom activities should be retained.”

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 11:28
The Coalition declared that Safe Schools would receive no federal funding after next year, when the  ...

不提供funding代表这个safe school program自由党会abolish吗？

lubber

no good

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 11:57
不提供funding代表这个safe school program自由党会abolish吗？

这是个NGO的组织，类似的组织还有很多很多，也不直接受政府管理，政府无权去直接取缔这个组织。
自由党能做的就是取消funding。 相反而工党如果上台，还要extend funding。

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 12:02
这是个NGO的组织，类似的组织还有很多很多，也不直接受政府管理，政府无权去直接取缔这个组织。
自由党能 ...

Safe school program和safe school coalition两回事儿吧？一个是教学课程一个是组织。那么多你说的对这个计划停止funding是对这个program的还是对这个组织的？

我问的是学校教小孩子的safe school program自由党会不会abolish?  毕竟这个program里有太多的不适合小孩子的内容。谢谢

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 12:47
Safe school program和safe school coalition两回事儿吧？一个是教学课程一个是组织。那么多你说的对这个 ...

我们这里讨论的就是这个课程，这个课程是由这个组织提供的，所以两者基本是一码事。

目前自由党联邦政府已经删除了很多过于激进的内容，同时叫停在Primary school推行这个课程。

Malcolm Turnbull ordered a review of the scheme this year following a revolt by a majority of the Coalition backbench, with Education Minister Simon Birmingham then limiting the program to secondary schools, removing inappropriate content and involving parents.

然后自由党的教育部长Senator Birmingham在国会确认，自由党政府明年不会继续给这个组织或课程拨款。

Senator Birmingham also confirmed to journalists at Parliament House today the Safe Schools program would not receive any more federal funding beyond 2017.

The Coalition declared that Safe Schools would receive no federal funding after next year, when the Gillard government’s $8 million contribution to the program runs out. It also banned links to third-party materials on the Safe Schools website, such as the promotion of gay and transgender youth network Minus 18.


与之相反，反对党工党committed to extending funding for the contentious Safe Schools program beyond 2017。
而维州Andrews工党政府的教育部长Merlino 已经给 Safe Schools 追加拨款 $300,000。
"The Andrews Labor government does not accept the federal government's recommendations, which completely undermine the Safe Schools Coalition anti-bullying program."


下面两个新闻，不需要付费用户也可以看到。

http://www.starobserver.com.au/n ... owing-review/147634

http://www.theage.com.au/victori ... 0160321-gnnkiz.html

T.T

谢楼主分享 , 今天没分, 先白条了

wbjmail

自由党不会继续拨款，目前的承诺是这样，但是不会取缔。这笔钱应该在17年用完，所以确切的说是18后联邦政府如果是自由党当权不再资助，但是如果州政府拨款还是会继续。

华人媒体上传的消息真是要格外小心，离事实差距颇大

含笑领便当

wbjmail 发表于 2016-6-21 13:34
自由党不会继续拨款，目前的承诺是这样，但是不会取缔。这笔钱应该在17年用完，所以确切的说是18后联邦政府 ...

维州工党政府的教育部长现在已经额外拨款300，000给这个课程，而且还不顾联邦政府的干涉继续强行在Primary school里推行这个课程。
维州的家长如果想要摆脱这个课程，只能让工党州政府下台。

wbjmail

那么这次选举是选州政府还是选联邦政府？我很糊涂

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 13:24
我们这里讨论的就是这个课程，这个课程是由这个组织提供的，所以两者基本是一码事。

目前自由党联邦政府 ...

实际上这个coalition和这个program并不是一回事，不过没问题，不重要。

我刚才的问题是，自由党停止funding以后（Coalition or Program )，这个safe school program还会不会继续在学校里推行?

这个我想对大多数的家长们比较重要，谢谢。

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 14:00
实际上这个coalition和这个program并不是一回事，不过没问题，不重要。

我刚才的问题是，自由党停止fund ...

这我真不好回答，如果它没funding了，就自己完蛋大吉，这样最好。但也许又有其他组织像维州工党政府那样给它提供资金让它活命呢？
从目前已知的新闻来看，自由党对这个program不支持，也对这个program进行了很多修改，但政府也不能强行禁止这个program，不然会被扣上政治不正确，恐同的帽子。
而工党是这个program的创造者，也是全力推动这个program的，维州工党教育部长甚至公开和联邦政府的命令叫板，继续在小学里推行这个program。
我觉得自由党和工党对待这个program的态度区别还是非常明显的，不难鉴别。

含笑领便当

wbjmail 发表于 2016-6-21 13:56
那么这次选举是选州政府还是选联邦政府？我很糊涂

今年2016年是选联邦政府。
VIC州政府下一次选举在2018年。

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 14:17
这我真不好回答，如果它没funding了，就自己完蛋大吉，这样最好。但也许又有其他组织像维州工党政府那样 ...

对，工党和自由党在这个问题上的确态度不同，但如果停止funding也不能停止safe school program的话，这两个党从结果上看没什么不同，自由党应该主动abolish而不是因为政治正确而睁一眼闭一眼。

其实自由党上台好几年也并没有主动review这个program，反而是一些backbenchers提出的动议。

这个议题在3月份review刚发表时候热了一阵子，后来已经没什么了，现在突然又被挖出来，微信上铺天盖地的都是让大家投自由党的，我反对safe school program，但恕我直言，工党和自由党一样烂。

wellye

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 14:19
今年2016年是选联邦政府。
VIC州政府下一次选举在2018年。

到时候我家孩子也要读书了 一定要把工党选下去

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 14:30
对，工党和自由党在这个问题上的确态度不同，但如果停止funding也不能停止safe school program的话，这两 ...

Well，如果是自由党竞选获胜，那么至少会停止给这个program拨款，也规定只能在secondary school里进行，情形不会比现在更坏。
如果是工党获胜，他们会extend funding给这个program，甚至还会在primary school里推行，情形肯定更糟糕。
如你所言，两党都很烂，但民主本来就是选一个比较不那么烂的么。

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 15:27
Well，如果是自由党竞选获胜，那么至少会停止给这个program拨款，也规定只能在secondary school里进行， ...

没错，如果你只看safe school program，你的一票应该投给CDP而不是工党或自由党，因为CDP可以完全地取消safe school program。

民主不是投第二烂的。

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 15:31
没错，如果你只看safe school program，你的一票应该投给CDP而不是工党或自由党，因为CDP可以完全地取消s ...

选小党容易又造成悬空政府，我眼里也不光看着SCCA这个事。
我也不投票给神棍的

sunbury

含笑领便当 发表于 2016-6-21 15:35
选小党容易又造成悬空政府，我眼里也不光看着SCCA这个事。
我也不投票给神棍的  ...

了解了，所以你也并没那么在乎这个safe school program，只是在为自由党拉票而已，没有问题。

说到神棍，你可能不知道反对safe school program的最坚定的就是你口里的神棍们了，没有他们和其他社会人士的推动，自由党里面那些基督徒议员们是不可能联署让政府review这个program的。

含笑领便当

sunbury 发表于 2016-6-21 15:44
了解了，所以你也并没那么在乎这个safe school program，只是在为自由党拉票而已，没有问题。

说到神棍 ...

我很重视这个program带来的影响，2015年我就已经发过关于这个program的帖子，提醒家长注意。

http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/f ... ead&tid=1119751

我所反对的是这个program包含的过于激进的内容，以及过早地在Primary school里开展这个课程。

本来联邦政府已经叫停在Primary school里开展这个课程，可从VIC看来工党是铁了心要推进这个课程，甚至还要进一步向美国学习搞男女同厕。
对CDP，我并不很了解这个党，看他们的纲领似乎是Christian至上，过于边缘化了，因此我也不会投票给他们。如果你觉得这个党很值得华人去投，大可以发个帖子来介绍一下这个党嘛。