|
此文章由 thundom 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 thundom 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 thundom 于 2014-2-20 09:49 编辑
ryol1234 发表于 2014-2-19 22:58 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708d9/708d94e12abfbe0289544d408715f7e727e6dff3" alt=""
不要理那个thumdom. 送私校就是考不上精英的说法真的让人笑死了。
读书不是光为一个考试,有钱没钱都是 ...
More compelling still, as corporate lawyer and father of six David Gillespie argues in his new book Free Schools, private schools offer no guarantee of a better educational outcome. You can fork out $150,000 for a child's schooling and essentially get nothing for it.
Private schools may perform decently in league tables but only because they use the fee-hurdle to select for socio-economic status, by far the best predictor of academic success. They further skew their results by giving scholarships to select gifted children who will up their average.
In other words, says Gillespie, once you correct for socio-economic advantage, our education system adds no value to what children bring from home. Losing such schools therefore has no net negative. In fact, by flooding middle class energy into the public system, it would bring massive gains.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/wh ... .html#ixzz2toJdhrsT
看不懂我给你翻译:私校对学业的影响微乎其微,很大一部分原因私校排名高都是因为有很多奖学金学生拉高的(也就是说跟你花了钱没啥关系,还得靠出色的孩子)。
至于你认为私校能给孩子所谓的“软实力”,我理解哈,我不知道是什么,是贵族气质么?父母是土包子,花点钱,孩子就气质了?
蛮有意思的,再就是哈,出得起私校的学费,不是别人不认可私校的理由哈,别再说什么别人嫉妒你一年多花好几万什么的,多花钱还值得嫉妒,这结论够缺心眼的。。。
我认识聪明孩子,出色的孩子,不是多花钱私校九牛逼了,还得遗传和父母熏陶,所以,掏了钱就觉得孩子高人一等说明父母就素质,能力普通了。。。或者父母一辈就自卑没能力,智商,觉得私校多花钱能弥补这种自卑?(我猜的哦,勿喷) |
|