|
|
此文章由 dunkerlc 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 dunkerlc 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
本帖最后由 dunkerlc 于 2024-12-13 15:10 编辑
你这个逻辑很奇怪，我都说了
L2 车主全责
L3和L4车主和车商都有责任
L5车商全责
还不清楚吗？
还在那说什么“哦，你也知道法律规定L3自动驾驶出了事故，车主需要承担责任，那么请问，车主的法律责任难道会因为厂家愿意赔钱就能免除吗？如果不能，厂家有什么资格可以单方承诺负全责呢？你说的“奔驰拿到L3最关键的点是出了车祸愿意赔钱”显然是不成立的。”
出了车祸谁的责任难道是车主划分？车商划分？为什么一定全部车主担责或者车商担责？在政策法规的基础上，根据事故划分的责任，各自承担各自的责任。
在政府制定的法律基础上，在澳洲保险公司划分吧，在中国是交警划分吧。划分好了，车主车商各自负担谁赔多少赔多少呗。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_self-driving_cars
In Australia, laws were designed for vehicles with human drivers, with more than 700 barriers to automated vehicles in state, territory and Commonwealth laws. Without new regulation Australia would not benefit from automated vehicles.[9] In Australia, the goal is to codify the framework into statute by 2026 via the Automated Vehicle Safety Law (AVSL) focused in three topics: first-supply, in-service, and state/territory road transport
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car_liability
Autonomous driving technologies arrived on the OECD market with an expected accelerated future deployment. Regulations aim compatibility of these automated vehicles with safety, legal responsibility and privacy public's expectations[5]
First national regulations address various topics:
using SAE wording as a de facto standard for definitions, and terminology such as operational design domain (ODD) automated driving system (ADS), and the dynamic driving task (DDT).
Government requirements for testing automated vehicles
Safety
Data concern
Assignment of liability
Protection of people outside of automated vehicles
清清楚楚的Assignment of liability，自动驾驶中的事故责任划分是政府考虑和制定相关法律法规的重中之重。如果按照你的逻辑一股脑都给车主或者车商满腔热血说我全包了，还要做这个工作干嘛呢？全世界政府吃饱了撑的？
不说什么引经据典，简单看下维基百科再评估一下自己的观点避免信口开河让人看笑话有那么难吗？和你沟通真的是浪费生命。Full Stop |
|
我的melbourne学车考车经历！ (2005-5-24) qhtony14 
楼主:violots
发表于 2024-12-11 15:01
