新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 你是读什么书长大的 (2007-12-20) astina · 半月谈第十六期(0905上)——《论语》与婆媳关系 (2009-5-1) big_beast
· 火大!我的亲身经历,黑心地产中介这必须算一个! (2005-4-29) noin · 参加活动-小家庭三天晚餐实录 (2010-7-12) thief
Advertisement
Advertisement
查看: 1537|回复: 2

退税 - might need to pay more too ato [复制链接]

发表于 2007-7-22 22:49 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 freshpoint 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 freshpoint 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
it's so bad that there is nothing much to offset against taxable income!

anybody has good ideas?

maybe it's time to buy a property, so less cash income which will be charged by ato
Advertisement
Advertisement

退役斑竹 2007 年度奖章获得者 2008年度奖章获得者 特殊贡献奖章 参与宝库编辑功臣

发表于 2007-7-23 07:17 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 黑山老妖 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 黑山老妖 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
40%tax bracket? Consider negative gearing, maybe. Doesn't have to be property can be shares or investment funds.

发表于 2007-7-23 23:07 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 freshpoint 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 freshpoint 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
good point mate! but property takes time, shares - not good enough to take geared position
funds - not enough return.

but property could be the most feasible one

where do you reckon is suitable for people livein city... 2 bedder +

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部