偷车，酒驾，超速，闯红灯，将步行女子撞飞80多米

kidz821

rip

三体1号文明

指控都撤销了就放出来当大爷供着呗。

lizhe1985

MyDreamFarm 发表于 2016-11-15 11:07
"检方随后撤销了危险驾驶导致他人死亡，行为鲁莽危及生命，以及事故后未能对受害人提供协助的几项罪名。" : ...

难道是以为说他酒驾了不知道自己撞死了人？？？？这样也行？？

sdxz2002

这种人真该死，最近过马路都有阴影了

hermigervil

MB的  司机咋不死呢  CNMD

哇哇哇

MyDreamFarm 发表于 2016-11-15 11:07
"检方随后撤销了危险驾驶导致他人死亡，行为鲁莽危及生命，以及事故后未能对受害人提供协助的几项罪名。" : ...

检方会因为被告的认罪表现而适当撤销一些罪名
常有的事

gavy

检方是sx吗    还撤销罪名    不如直接算醉驾扣分

winover

SB的澳洲法律啊

嚎哥

持枪是个真话题

louiz

工党说罪犯是弱势群体。要保护。

Xenabear

我只能说在凸凹天黑下班请马上回家哪里也不要去

epoxboy

澳洲应该引入新加坡鞭刑，让那些年青人受些皮肉苦，以后收敛点，反正目前也关不了他们几年，让他们记住皮肉痛苦也是值得的

嚎哥

持枪是个真话题

xkhu1

if I am this girl's parents, I would dedicate the rest of my life to destroy this guy....

victorliu

蹲几年牢，遣返吧

sdcmc

Rip

iameagles

谋杀

5wego

在凸凹是不是醉驾和精神病犯罪享受同等待遇

farmerzheng

100小时社区服务，根据澳洲法律，我替法官严判了

heaichen

澳洲的法律体系太可怕了，居然撤销几项。。。不懂

linrong

检方随后撤销了危险驾驶导致他人死亡，行为鲁莽危及生命，以及事故后未能对受害人提供协助的几项罪名。
为啥？

dxdxxxxxxxx

你看，在中国需要拼爹（没个李刚爸爸就搞不定）的事情，在澳洲就完全不需要了，多少完美的制度，让普通的犯罪分子也可以享受到天朝衙内们的待遇。屁民们还不山呼万岁！

lm2068830

如果司机是亚裔的话，估计就没那么走运了，大头贴上报纸头版。。

farmerzheng

dxdxxxxxxxx 发表于 2016-11-15 12:55
你看，在中国需要拼爹（没个李刚爸爸就搞不定）的事情，在澳洲就完全不需要了，多少完美的制度，让普通的犯 ...

前提是得长着一张罪犯后人的脸

FEIPO

RIP

dxdxxxxxxxx

farmerzheng 发表于 2016-11-15 13:13
前提是得长着一张罪犯后人的脸

那是当然

luftcao

为何还撤销几项罪名！

ItsThere

真可怜，RIP。

Grassjelly

检方随后撤销了危险驾驶导致他人死亡，行为鲁莽危及生命，以及事故后未能对受害人提供协助的几项罪名!!!!

s3209395

reddit上看到的

Generally speaking, when charging someone that they intend to take to court, they pretty much go through the book and write them up for everything that even makes a little sense given the crime because the more they charge him with, the more likely that at least one (or more) is going to stick.

Also, if they charge him with a bunch of things, they can then say "we'll drop these charges if you plead guilty to these ones" (dropping the ones they had no intention of pursuing or would expect to not be upheld). It allows them to seem reasonable, get their conviction and not have to drag it through the court. It's probably so prosecutors and police have good conviction records but it has the side effect of saving the state money by pleading it out before it gets to the court room.

That's my read on it, based on the experience of a friend of mine some years ago. He got busted for something, they charged him with 1200 (yes, you read that number right) offences. They ended up getting 2 to stick. If they had charged him with 2 things, he might have gotten off because those 2 were ones he eventually pleaded to, rather than them winning an actual court case for the conviction.