|
|
此文章由 xhchris 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xhchris 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
bbc007 发表于 2017-2-17 23:17 
媒体利用采访林女把公众的注意力集中到性侵犯上，因为没有其它有力的证据！只有这一条能激起公众对判决的 ...
能完全看懂下面两段判词的人自然会明白对MS AB的伤害只是终身监禁的因素之一。公然造谣无底线啊。
While a finding of future dangerousness is not a precondition to the imposition of a life sentence under s 61(1) of the Sentencing Act, the circumstances in which this offender presents for sentence allows me to find that there is a risk of him committing further offences of violence, a risk that has not been ameliorated by the passage of time since the murders or qualified by any expression of remorse. The meticulous planning involved in the timing and styling of the murders, coupled with the offender’s resolve to execute that plan and then to persist with the infliction of extreme violence with the intention that all occupants of the house should die, despite the active resistance offered by Terry Lin, the youngest victim, as he struggled for his life, is an ample basis upon which to make that finding. The risk that this offender may commit offences of violence in the future, and the community’s legitimate expectation that it is protected from that risk, is amplified by the sexual violence the offender inflicted on Ms AB after the murders, as the surviving member of her family.
While the law does not permit a sentencing judge to take into account in the imposition of sentence any additional penalty because a family member of a murder victim has suffered through their death, since it is the criminal culpability in the taking of life itself that is the departure point for the appointment of criminal punishment, in this case the far reaching and immeasurable harm done to Ms AB is also an aspect of the harm done to the community and, for that reason, as provided for in s 28(4) of the Sentencing Act, I also take that into account when imposing life sentences in this case. |
|
女儿childcare所感 (2006-9-8) 爱吃糖的小猪 
楼主:猫儿不笨
发表于 2017-2-17 22:39
